Holiday Wishes 2006, Feedback!
Jan. 15th, 2007 08:12 pmHoliday Wishes 2006 officially ends tonight! Last chance to submit your wishlist, you have a few more hours!
[Poll #907527]
The rest of the comments are an open feedback post. Post anything you'd like -- ideas for next year, thanks to others, cat macros... just er, no porn please :) And please try not to cause any wank. For this reason, anonymous comments will be screened. Additionally, if you'd like to make any suggestions directly to the mods, you can e-mail us at wishlist.project (at) gmail (dot) com (YES! WE FINALLY HAVE A JOINT E-MAIL ADDRESS! HUZZAH!)
P.S. I apologize for the poll getting screwed up the first time around. These things happen. Always. As you probably know...
ETA: If in the first question, you selected the last option ["It didn't go so well for me..."], feel free to e-mail the mods at the above address to explain why if you don't want to post a public comment. We'll try to be as responsive as we can, and address any issues people may have had.
[Poll #907527]
The rest of the comments are an open feedback post. Post anything you'd like -- ideas for next year, thanks to others, cat macros... just er, no porn please :) And please try not to cause any wank. For this reason, anonymous comments will be screened. Additionally, if you'd like to make any suggestions directly to the mods, you can e-mail us at wishlist.project (at) gmail (dot) com (YES! WE FINALLY HAVE A JOINT E-MAIL ADDRESS! HUZZAH!)
P.S. I apologize for the poll getting screwed up the first time around. These things happen. Always. As you probably know...
ETA: If in the first question, you selected the last option ["It didn't go so well for me..."], feel free to e-mail the mods at the above address to explain why if you don't want to post a public comment. We'll try to be as responsive as we can, and address any issues people may have had.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:07 am (UTC)The latter is possible -- I didn't make a wishlist this year so didn't receive anything, but in the past I've gotten some very beat-up packages that just weren't wrapped properly and items could have fallen out very easily, I'm sure.
Just in case, we could add to the new list of guidelines, rules, etc. to make sure that you use proper packaging. It might be common sense, but some people may not have proper materials to do so (I think the messy package that I received once was basically an old plastic mailing envelope with a lot of tape on it...)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:31 am (UTC)I really enjoyed participating, the best part was the people I got to know through the community. Granting the wishes was a lot of fun. My only disappointment was that 3 out 4 people who offered to send me packages never did. Overall, the wishes people granted virtually yielded much better results. And of all the packages I sent, only two were even acknowledged, which was kinda a bummer.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:41 am (UTC)We will definately try to figure out something to do about those who fail to follow through, since that's the most common complaint so far.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-04 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 08:43 am (UTC)However, I sent out several articles of clothing (many with tags), art that I had created specifically for the person, and several other miscellaneous items. I got a handful of thank you's. And those were mostly just for cards I sent. It was disappointing to send someone brand new items and not even know if they received them or not.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 10:51 am (UTC)In addition, I don't remember whether there was a warning for minors when signing up? Youngsters especially should not post addresses.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 12:04 am (UTC)You know what? I am *very* ashamed to say that it wasn't. This will *definately* be monitored next year. THANK YOU for pointing this out, seriously. I can't believe we didn't have a policy about that (other than discouraging people from posting addresses in their lists, and providing them only upon request.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 02:48 pm (UTC)Better to give, than to receive
Date: 2007-01-16 11:23 pm (UTC)I don't participate in this community because "If I send out this many packages, then I'll get this many presents in return." I stayed with the community, even through the LJ Spotlight onslaught, because the giving of time and treasure is what the winter holiday season is about. Give because you want to, not because you expect something in return. The generosity of spirit is a gift you give to yourself every time.
This is not to say that you should not receive acknowledgement for your gift.
When I had to hunt down a person to ask if s/he had received the gift that I sent, I learned then to be more courteous and to send thank you cards & emails promptly because I now knew how much joy could be had from knowing that gifts were appreciated.
I'm really glad that I stopped lurking and jumped into the Holiday Wish granting. I learned a lot more than I thought I would.
One more thing
Date: 2007-01-16 11:33 pm (UTC)I thought you could ask for one specific thing per wish. As in "I want this book," "I want Season 5," and "I want a gift card from here."
Re: One more thing
Date: 2007-01-17 12:00 am (UTC)At the very least, we will limit ONE external wishlist (i.e. amazon).
The bottom line is, even if we don't limit what people ask for -- it's up to others as to whether or not they want to send something.
But yes -- rules will definately be clarified next year.
Re: One more thing
Date: 2007-01-17 12:58 am (UTC)You are absolutely correct. Thanks for the response!
Re: One more thing
Date: 2007-02-05 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 06:05 pm (UTC)For "what would you like to change":
Tagging system or some other system that helps searchability somehow would be nice. Of course there are already tags, but not all use them, and personally I'd like them to be a bit more specific, at least for some popular items, than they're now. Also a link list to wishes (with usernames) would be really helpful, I think. It's another question how difficult it'd be to make...
Then just a suggestion: it could be added to guidelines that wishlists be made easy to read - if there're lots of posts, it's nice to be able to just quickly look through them for what you can give. Such as proper grammar or bolding the keywords (eg "I'd like cards) which most admittedly already did, but not all.
Then about thanking. There's
All in all, I had a really great experience with
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:25 am (UTC)We emphasize the use of tags as much as we can, but some people don't bother, forget, or can't figure them out. We're adding more mods next year, so hopefully we'll be able to pick up the slack.
Bolding is a good suggestion. Also, possibly telling people not to use fancy fonts. Some people don't know that what looks pretty on their own screen might be virtually unreadable on others :)
We tried to emphasize personal thanks as well. The creation of
Great! And thank YOU for participating! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 12:38 am (UTC)It would be really cool if there was a way that a post could be auto-tagged. Say if you posted the first week of December, your post would be tagged for that week. I don't know if that's possible, but I think it'd be helpful for people trying to read through ALL of the posts looking for wishes to grant. Although I suppose it would be possible now, with someone else being able to add a tag to a post.
It got a little chaotic for a while, trying to keep up with the posts and trying to find ones to answer. I think quite a few posts got 'lost' in the shuffle.
I liked it though, made a few new LJ friends, got a few cards and even a present, but it was a little overwhelming, scanning through posts of people asking for outrageous things. *guilty look* I had a few "dream" wishes on my list, but then several more sensible and reasonable ones.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:05 am (UTC)Well, er, with any luck -- we WON'T be LJ-spotted next year, and we won't have such a barrage of posts in such a short period of time, and everything will be spread out over November and December like it was originally intended ;D
Glad you had fun! :) But yes, usually easy and sensible wishes get the most response, LOL.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 05:10 am (UTC)Don't worry though, there will definitely be more reminders in store :) Plus, more volunteers on the moderator end to help with tagging. Stay tuned!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 12:57 am (UTC)Of all of the money that I've spent, I've only got about three LJ friends to show for it. And, about that many people who were appreciative. I put a lot of heart and personality into my gifts, and it seemed to me that the lot of people I was granting to just took it without much of a thanks.
Maybe I'm cynical, I don't know. But I'm glad to hear that some people had a good experience with it this past year. I'm hoping maybe later this year I can try it again. We'll see.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:20 am (UTC)I hope you had a good holiday, regardless :) And we will definately be implementing some changes for next year to attempt to do something about 'deadbeats' (i.e. making sure that journals have been in existence for a certain amount of time, emphasizing not to comment unless you actually intend to send something, always bookmark your giftee's wishlist so you know where to send something, etc.) so I hope you won't give up hope yet :)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:23 am (UTC)BTW, I do have to mention though that the people who I have befriended from this community are some of the sweetest and loveliest, so it hasn't been all bad ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:28 am (UTC)Great to know! :D
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 10:33 pm (UTC)I sent out around two dozen physical cards and about five gifts but spent literally hours every day giving as many virtual gifts as possible (icons, recommendations, etc.) Because of my health, I don't have a job so mailing things were hard. Still, it felt damned good to give people something and pretty much everyone I made virtual presents for thanked me right away in comments. (Which was fine by me.)
I actually felt bad because I didn't avail myself of the
I just wanted to thank everyone - mods included - for a wonderful time. I will certainly be back next year!
no subject
I also was unable to thank everyone who sent me things. I forget who it was, but someone sent me some manga on a CD-ROM, and I really enjoyed it. :D Whoever you were, thank you!
And whoever sent me the cute stuffed Saint Bernard puppy from England, thanks!!! I was so excited to get him; I've named him Scruffy.
Also, the two people in Finland who sent me the little chocolates in wrappers that looked like their national flag, thank you! It was delicious; I'm always curious to see how other countries do chocolate. :)
Thanks to the mods for making this community such an enjoyable experience. I wasn't able to do much (sorry again), but I had fun doing what I was able to.
cards only
Date: 2007-10-07 04:34 am (UTC)